Wednesday, 11 January 2012

QLD Warwick Zoning rules will mean fewer flats

Zoning rules will mean fewer flats

NEW provisions in the draft planning scheme for the Southern Downs Regional Council area will make it harder for flats to be built in certain parts of Warwick.
The draft planning scheme for the Southern Downs council region aims to make it harder for units to be built in residential areas further from the Warwick central business district, but they will be encouraged in streets in closer proximity to the CBD.
NEW provisions in the draft planning scheme for the Southern Downs Regional Council area will make it harder for flats to be built in parts of Warwick away from the residential zone immediately framing the central business district.
Streets in close proximity to the CBD have been earmarked as a new “Residential Choice” zone where flats and townhouses will be encouraged, but in the proposed “Residential Living” zone they will be discouraged as much as possible.
The Residential Living zone includes parts of the “dress circle” area in the vicinity of Locke and Pratten Sts, most of the Rosenthal Heights and Glennie Heights areas and parts of east Warwick.
Maps showing the zones are available for viewing at council, with planner Jeanette Davis yesterday encouraging people to check which zone their property was in.
Ms Davis said the intent of the Residential Living zone was to preserve the older character of Warwick and typically larger blocks of around 1000 square metres.
But she reminded homeowners that while council could use its planning rules to discourage types of development the State Government’s planning act – under which council planning schemes sit – did not “prohibit” anything.
“It will still be possible to apply to develop units in the Residential Living zone, but what we are proposing are provisions which make it a less acceptable outcome,” she said yesterday.
Ms Davis pointed to provisions for the Residential Living zone which will require one-bedroom units with a maximum floor area of 60sqm to be built on at least 400sqm of “site area”, and units with more than one bedroom or with a floor area of greater than 60sqm to be on at least 500sqm.
In theory this should make it harder for property owners in the Residential Living zone to demolish or remove older homes to build flats, but only homes on the council or state heritage lists will be subject to public advertising if they are proposed to go.
The draft planning scheme will replace the Warwick and Stanthorpe Town Plans which existed before amalgamation.
Public comments on the draft scheme close on September 16. Documents and zone maps, are available for viewing at the Warwick and Stanthorpe council offices or online at

CBD in a 'straightjacket'

WARWICK'S already-squeezed central business district will remain that way unless rules in the draft planning scheme for the region are reviewed.
The above is taken from the council’s new draft planning scheme for the region. The blue section is the existing Central Business District which the council intends to keep as is.

WARWICK'S already-squeezed central business district will remain that way unless rules in the draft planning scheme for the region are reviewed, a leading development industry figure says.
Surveyor and planning consultant Gary Hayes yesterday pointed to the lack of vacant sites in the existing CBD - bounded by Albion, Percy and Guy Sts and Queens Park - and is calling for its expansion east of Albion St.
Mr Hayes said he was concerned that keeping the CBD as it was would more or less rule out any major new retail development in Warwick, with leading retailers not already in town likely to have Warwick in their sights over the next decade or so.
He said he believed the CBD, designated as the "Principal Centre Zone" in the draft scheme, should be extended east of Albion Street to take in the three blocks bounded by Percy, Canning and Albert streets, an area proposed to be designated as "Mixed Use".
"My concern is that while allowance has been made for the expansion of Warwick's residential and industrial zones, we have a CBD with a very high occupancy, but if anyone wanted to come in with a major new retail development there is no provision for that," Mr Hayes said.
"Retail players are going to come to town over the next 10 years or so and are going to find that development in the CBD has effectively been frozen, unless we review the boundary.
"We now have a CBD getting towards an 80 per cent occupancy rate and with a lot of heritage-listed buildings, so it is getting pretty tight and we also need to preserve the car-parking that's there now."
Mr Hayes acknowledged there was a residential component in the three blocks east of Albion St he proposes for a CBD expansion, but he said the area was already a mix of uses, with some of them better suited elsewhere.
"The Ergon depot is one example of this - it really should be out in the industrial estate," Mr Hayes said.
"The area it's in now is better suited to large retail and you would have fewer entrances out onto the highway."
Mr Hayes said he had lodged a submission on the planning scheme which also called for an easing of the rules on converting retail sites to professional office space, with a major demand for the latter.
Mayor Ron Bellingham conceded there was pressure on the CBD and said council would take a good look at the Hayes proposal as planning scheme submissions were sifted through.
"I am aware that immediately to the west of the existing area designated as the CBD you have Central School and other heritage sites and residences," the mayor said.
"So pushing the CBD out on that western side would create some issues, but if you look towards the east you would then have a CBD bisected by a national highway."

No comments:

Post a Comment